CO129-521-13 Chinese Customs- proposed agreement with Hong Kong 27-8-1930 - 16-10-1930 — Page 480

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All

JOHN SWIRE & SONS LTD

TELEGRAPHIC ADDRESS,

TEMSELOAF, FEN, LONDON.

72775/30

(9

My Lord,

8. Billiter Square.

London E

ECS.

5517

19th June, 1930.

Hong Kong Customs Agreement.

X

We ventured to write to you on January 29th, urging the

importance of a satisfactory settlement between the Colony of Hong Kong and the Chinese Customs, and we are greatly disturbed by the latest news from our people in the East to the effect that

a settlement is apparently not even in sight.

It should not be necessary to emphasize the importance of this agreement to the Colony itself, which has suffered so much

in the past from a lack of good relations with China, especially

Canton, and will surely continue to suffer, if the source of

friction between the two Governments, inherent in the present

development of Hong Kong under the increased Chinese tariff as a smuggling centre, is not removed. Apart moreover from the purely colonial aspect of the question there is the far more important matter of Anglo-Chinese relations as a whole and their reactions on British trade with a country, which offers as good a prospect as any other section of our trade of dealing genuinely

with unemployment in this country. If the relations between

Hong Kong and China are not satisfactory, as they will not be

without this agreement, the whole British position suffers.

At one time the Government of Hong Kong were willing to

conclude an agreement with the Customs on certain terms, among

which were the inclusion of Articles V & X. The former proposes

to give certain privileges to vessels under the British flag,

which have not been enjoyed before and to which in view of their

wish to close their inland waters trade to the foreign flag the

Chinese Government will according to all our definite information

and to the best of our own belief never agree. Even if they would, there is considerable divergence of opinion, whether this clause is a good thing in itself, and we ourselves as British

Page 480Page 481

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.